How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Nemo cumque quis qui velit unde nihil.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

5 daily habits suggested by top US doctor that protect the brain from early cognitive decline - Times of India

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

For example, Jesus has a God …

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

How do the Sola Scrptura folks react to the Dead Sea Scrolls and other more recent discoveries of ancient Biblical texts not among those canonized by Martin Luther?

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.